New Delhi: Music label Saregama has sought contempt of court action against renowned composer Ilaiyaraaja before the Delhi High Court, alleging that he violated an existing interim injunction issued in an ongoing copyright dispute concerning songs and sound recordings from more than 130 films.

The controversy stems from a suit filed by Saregama, which claims ownership over a large catalogue of songs composed by Ilaiyaraaja for various Tamil films. Earlier, the Delhi High Court granted interim relief in favour of Saregama and restrained Ilaiyaraaja from using, licensing, exploiting, or claiming ownership rights over the disputed works pending adjudication of the case.

According to Saregama, despite the court's directions, certain actions undertaken by Ilaiyaraaja allegedly amounted to a breach of the injunction order. The company has therefore moved the court seeking initiation of contempt proceedings, arguing that non-compliance with judicial orders undermines the authority of the court and causes continuing prejudice to its claimed copyright interests.

The copyright dispute centres on competing claims regarding ownership and control over musical compositions and sound recordings associated with a substantial catalogue of classic Tamil cinema. Saregama maintains that it possesses valid rights over the recordings, while Ilaiyaraaja has challenged aspects of the company's claims.

The Delhi High Court had previously refused to vacate the interim protection granted to Saregama, allowing the restraint order to remain operative until final adjudication. The court observed that maintaining the status quo was necessary while the ownership issues were being examined.

The latest contempt application introduces a new dimension to the litigation by focusing not only on copyright ownership but also on compliance with court directives. If the court finds a wilful breach of its order, contempt proceedings could follow in addition to the substantive copyright dispute.

The outcome of the matter is expected to be closely watched by stakeholders in the music and entertainment industries, as it may influence future disputes involving copyright ownership, licensing rights, and enforcement of judicial injunctions in the creative sector.