Case UpdateConstitutional Law📍 Supreme Court of India
Attorney General & Solicitor General Must Actively Participate In Every BCI Decision: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court directed that Attorney General R. Venkataramani and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta must actively participate in all policy decisions of the Bar Council of India (BCI) pending its complete reconstitution through State Bar Council elections.
📅 02 Sep 2026👤 For: All Legal Professionals📰 Source:
Bar and Bench👁 5 views
⚖️ Case Details
Yogamaya MG v. Union of India & Ors.
Supreme Court of India
Chief Justice Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi, and Justice V. Mohana
02 Sep 2026
2026 LiveLaw (SC) 882 / Writ Petition (Civil)
Whether the Bar Council of India (BCI) Chairperson can continue on extended tenure via gazette notifications without fresh statutory elections, and whether key financial and administrative decisions require oversight.
The Supreme Court of India has ordered that Attorney General (AG) R. Venkataramani and Solicitor General (SG) Tushar Mehta actively participate in every policy decision taken by the Bar Council of India (BCI), addressing allegations of gross illegalities in the leadership and functioning of the body.
BCI Reconstitution Deferred Pending State Elections
A Bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi, and Justice V. Mohana passed the directions while hearing a batch of petitions challenging the continuous extension of Senior Advocate Manan Kumar Mishra as Chairperson of the BCI and the creation of a new BCI trust (PEARL Trust).
Key Directions Issued by the Apex Court
Active Participation of Law Officers: Both the Attorney General for India and Solicitor General for India shall be actively associated with every policy decision taken by the Bar Council of India to ensure transparency and accountability.
Two-Week Timeline for State Bar Representatives: Newly constituted State Bar Councils were directed to complete their co-option process and elect their statutorily prescribed representatives to the BCI within two weeks of notification.
Reconstitution Post Compliance: The Court ruled that the issue of total reconstitution of the BCI under Section 4 of the Advocates Act, 1961 will be considered once all State Bar Councils file compliance reports.
The interim directions aim to enforce institutional oversight over the BCI while facilitating the democratic statutory election process across all state-level Bar bodies.
📌 Held by the Court
Directed the AG and SG to oversee and participate in all BCI policy decisions. State Bar Councils were ordered to elect representatives within two weeks to enable fresh BCI reconstitution.
⚡ Practical Impact
Restores oversight on the regulatory body for legal education and practice in India while forcing state bar councils to expedite internal elections.
👔 For Lawyers & Advocates
Directly impacts legal regulatory administration, BCI election processes, and statutory governance under the Advocates Act, 1961.
🤖 Key Takeaway
Statutory election timelines under the Advocates Act must be strictly adhered to, and administrative oversight will be maintained via ex-officio top law officers pending complete reconstitution.